Skip to main content

Hydro Hopes: The Indian trap

Energy experts say new Indian policy will discriminate against Nepal’s private sector and non-Indian investors


The ‘Guidelines on Cross Border Trade of Electricity’ issued by India’s Ministry of Power last week poses a serious challenge to hydropower development in Nepal. The document, which India claims is aimed at facilitating cross border electricity trade with its neighbors, is in fact aimed at discouraging foreign Direct Investment (FDI) in Nepal from countries other than India. Some commentators have even gone to the extent of claiming that this move is a trap for Nepal and other countries engaged in cross-border electricity trade with India.

The main objectionable point of the Guidelines is Clause 5.2.1, which considers India’s cross-border electricity trade an issue of strategic, national and economic importance and is aimed at controlling hydropower development in its neighbors including Nepal. Clause 5.2.1 (a) of the Guidelines has paved the way for India to import electricity produced by Indian companies in Nepal, Bhutan and Bangladesh (three countries which are engaged in cross border electricity trade with India) but has restricted the import of electricity produced by the private sector or foreign companies in these countries.

Ironically, India claims that the Guidelines are “to facilitate and promote cross border trade of electricity with greater transparency, consistency and predictability in regulatory approaches across jurisdictions and minimize perception of regulatory risks.” However, the document says India will issue permission only to those Indian entities, companies owned or funded by the Government of India, Indian Public Sector Units and private companies with at least 51 percent Indian entity ownership. This means India will import electricity produced in Nepal by only those companies where an Indian entity—public or private—has at least 51 percent stake.

Similarly, Clause 5.2.1 (b) allows “the import of electricity by Indian entities from projects having 100 percent equity by Indian entity and/or the Government/Government owned or controlled company(ies) of neighboring country.”  Likewise, Clause 5.2.2 of the Guidelines reads: “Any other participating entity shall be eligible to participate in cross border trade of electricity after obtaining approval of the designated authority on case to case basis.”

Consequences for Nepal
 
The above-mentioned provisions of the Guidelines mean that only Nepal Electricity Authority (NEA) can do power trading with India. Any other entity, partially owned by the government or any other private or public limited company, needs case by case approval for exporting electricity to India. Any other trading parties or projects financed or developed by foreign direct investment other than India have been put in ‘case to case’ category. This means a controlled access to Nepal’s private sector as well as foreign investors. Energy experts and independent power producers in Nepal have said that the new Indian policy will not create a level playing field for Nepal’s private sector investors and non-Indian investors. The Indian goal, they say, is to discourage private sector and foreign direct investment from countries other than India. 

For big foreign investors, India is a major market for the hydroelectricity produced in Nepal. In fact, foreign investors have the huge Indian market in mind when they decide to invest in big hydro projects. According to energy experts, as the new Indian guidelines has restricted import of electricity produced in Nepal by Nepali private companies or foreign investors, private as well as foreign investment in Nepal’s hydropower has been greatly discouraged. “The possibility of FDI from countries other than India in export-oriented hydropower projects in Nepal has virtually ended now. Likewise, the possibility of independent power producers in Nepal investing in export-oriented projects, too, has ended,” said a hydropower entrepreneur.   

For its part, India has claimed that the Guidelines have been prepared to implement the SAARC Framework Agreement for Energy Cooperation signed during the 18th SAARC Summit held in Kathmandu in 2014. However, experts claim that the guidelines are aimed at setting environment for importing energy generated by three hydropower projects—900 MW Aurn III, 900 MW Upper Karnali and 600 MW Upper Marshyangdi-2—being developed by Indian companies or Indian investors.

Against Nepal-India PTA

The provisions of the new Indian guidelines are in clear contravention of the provisions of the Power Trade Agreement (PTA) signed between India and Nepal. Especially, the new Indian policy breaches the free access provision in the PTA.
 
Article I of the PTA states, “This Agreement will enable cooperation in the power sector, including developing transmission interconnections, grid connectivity, power exchange, and trading through the governmental, public and private enterprises of the two countries on mutually acceptable terms.” But the Guidelines issued on December 5th have directly discouraged Nepali private enterprises from exporting electricity to India.

Similarly, Article II (b) says, “The Parties [India and Nepal] shall allow non-discriminatory access to the cross-border interconnection(s) for all authorized/licensed participants in the common electricity market.” However, the Guidelines have created discrimination between Nepali private producers/foreign investors and Indian public/private companies while importing electricity from Nepal. The Guidelines create a lopsided playing field. Needless to say, the “case to case” approval provision will be cumbersome for third-country investors.

Similarly Article IV (b) of the PTA says: “The Parties [Nepal and India] shall allow the authorized/licensed electricity producers/ buyers/traders of each country to engage in cross-border electricity trading, including that through Power Exchanges, and to seek cross-border transmission access as per the laws of the respective country”. 

Push for amendment

Energy experts and independent power producers in Nepal are in unison that Nepal should immediately start diplomatic efforts for an amendment in the Guidelines so as to create level playing field for all investors.

“As the new Indian guidelines on cross border trade of electricity hampers hydropower development in Nepal, the government should, without any delay, start discussions with India for its amendment,” said an independent Nepali power producer, “Otherwise, Nepal’s hydropower development will fall into the Indian trap.”

Akhilesh Tripathi

12-12-2016, MyRepubliva

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bhattarai stresses on rebuilding Nepal-India ties

- Kamal Dev Bhattarai Former Prime Minister and Coordinator of Naya Shakti Nepal Baburam Bhattarai has said that there is a lack of ‘proper understanding’ in India about Nepal. Speaking to Post before concluding his visit to India on Tuesday, leader Bhattarai said mainly young generation of India has some flawed understanding about Nepal and bilateral relations between the two countries. The former prime minister maintained that there is a need of dialogue, debate and discussions to rebuild the bilateral relations in the change political context Nepal and India. Bhattarai made such remark after extensive discussions with Indian intellectual and policy makers during his seven-day stay in New Delhi.  Bhattarai underlined the need for building a bilateral relation between two countries at the top political levels. Bhattarai was of the view that there has been a huge change in the political scenario of both countries and bilateral relation should be rebuilt accordingly. He ...

Reduce Poverty: Much Neglected

Dilli Raj Khanal A progressive distributional policy together with the suitable institutional setups and arrangements at the grassroots for ensuring exclusively the access of poor to social and physical infrastructure as well as financial services is also a necessity . As a part of global event, poverty eradication day was celebrated in Nepal recently with claims that Nepal is one of the best performers in this area. If estimated poverty trends are looked into, there are no grounds to refute such an assertion. According to official figures, in 20 year’s period poverty has reduced by more than 20 per cent, from 41.8 per cent in 1995/96 to 21.2 per cent in 2015/16. Compared to the average GDP growth rate of 3.7 per cent in that period, the poverty reduction rate was about 3.2 per cent per annum. The breakdown by different updated poverty estimated periods give an interesting pattern. For instance, the annual poverty reduction rate was sharpest at 3.7 per cent annually during ...

House panel has decided 3 % threshold provision

State Affairs Committee of the Parliament has decided to impose a threshold of three percent and at least one seat under the First-Past-the-Post electoral system to secure seats under the proportional representation system. The committee meeting on Wednesday took the decision to impose the threshold. Earlier, a sub committee formed by the committee decided to impose 3 percent threshold in the upcoming parliamentary election to become national political party. According to the subcommittee member Rameshwor Phuyal, the 27th meeting of the panel decided to provision three percent threshold after the rigorous discussion.  "Any political party must secure at least three percent seat under the Proportional Representation (PR) category and at least one seat under First-Past-the-Post category to become the national political party," said Phuyal.  He hailed the decision of the 11-member panel as historic. The sub-committee was failing to endorse the Bill Related to ...