Skip to main content

Way paved for forming constituency delineation commission


 

Paving the way for the formation of a commission to recommend new electoral constituencies under the new constitution, parliament on Monday endorsed the Constituency Delineation Bill through fast track. In less than 10 months, the government must finalize new electoral constituencies in line with Article 286 of the constitution for holding provincial and parliamentary elections. Article 84 of the new constitution has proposed reducing the existing 240 electoral constituencies to 165 for parliamentary elections. Likewise, as provisioned in Article 176, the number of electoral constituencies for a given provincial assembly will be double the number of lawmakers that province sends to the federal parliament. 

The commission will finalize altogether 495 electoral constituencies, including 165 for the House of Representatives and 330 for the provincial assemblies. Amending the original bill tabled by the government, parliament included a provision stating that a constituency for the federal parliament should include twice as many constituencies for the provincial assembly. The amendment also made it mandatory to delineate at least two constituencies in a district for the provincial assembly. 

The first amendment to the new constitution effected in January 2016 had given the commission the mandate to delineate new electoral constituencies, taking population as the main basis and geography as a secondary basis. Section-5 of the bill states that population should be the main basis and geography the second basis while delineating electoral constituencies in the country.  Several lawmakers had registered an amendment proposal demanding revision of various provisions, and the House endorsed the bill through fast-track, incorporating some of the amendments. The bill, which has spelled out the jurisdiction of the commission among other things, will become law after the president endorses it.

According to the constitutional provisions, a retired justice of the Supreme Court shall be appointed chairperson of the commission and the four other members will include a geographer, a sociologist or demographer, an administration expert or jurist, and a gazetted special class officer as member-secretary.  The bill mentions that the decisions of the commission cannot be challenged in any court of law and will be implemented after the Election Commission publishes it in the Nepal Gazette. Making an amendment in the original bill, the House mentioned that the government must submit the report of the commission to the Election Commission within 15 days. 

The bill further proposes that the commission cannot split any existing district, village council or municipality ward while delineating new electoral constituencies for the federal parliament. However, the commission can split village councils and municipalities while delineating constituencies for provincial assemblies, reads the bill.  Also endorsing another bill, related to the number of wards, through fast track on Monday, parliament paved the way for the Election Commission to hold elections at the ward level as per the new local structures. 

MyRepublica

21/03/2017

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Bill registration an important step: India

India has said the Nepal government’s registration of a constitution amendment bill in Parliament is an “important step”. “As part of the ongoing efforts, the registering of a Constitution Amendment Bill in the Nepali Parliament on November 29, 2016 is an important step,” said Spokesperson for Indian Ministry of External Affairs Vikas Swarup. Responding to the Post’s question on the bill, Swarup said, “Our consistent position has been that peace, stability and progress of Nepal is in the interest of both India and Nepal. We have therefore been supportive of initiatives of the government of Nepal to meet the aspirations of all sections of its society through dialogue and constitutional process. “We hope that all sides will remain closely engaged and the ongoing efforts would be concluded successfully,” he said, while reiterating that “as a close and friendly neighbour of Nepal, India will continue to extend all support for Nepal’s peace, stability and economic development as prioritized …

Amendment proposal at behest of India: Oppn MPs

Opposition lawmakers have claimed that the government registered the constitution amendment bill in Parliament at the behest of India. The opposition parties obstructed the meeting of Parliament for the third consecutive time on Sunday, demanding the withdrawal of the amendment bill, which proposes reviewing the province boundaries, the citizenship provisions and the criteria for representation in the National Assembly.
“It will be treachery if the constitution, which was promulgated with the backing of 90 percent of people's representatives, is amended on the instructions of any foreign country,” said Nepal Workers Peasants Party (NWPP) lawmaker Anuradha Thapa Magar while speaking at the House, Sunday. Lawmakers from opposition parties, including the CPN-UML, CPN (ML), NWPP, Rartriya Janamorcha and Nepa Party, stood up at their respective places and obstructed House proceedings right after Speaker Onsari Gharti announced commencement of the meeting.

As Speaker Gharti allowed the op…

Minister of my health

Biswas BaralThe curious case of Gagan Thapa I don’t know Gagan Thapa well. What I know better is that I want him to continue as my health minister. How many ministers have there been in the post-1990 democratic Nepal who have done something worthwhile for the common folks and not directed all their focus on enriching themselves and their mother parties? Gokarna Bista. Lalbabu Pandit. Janardan Sharma. Narayan Kaji Shrestha. There aren’t many. This is why when we have someone like Gagan Thapa in the cabinet we should ensure that he stays put for at least a few years. 
If you want to know what Thapa has done, you only need to visit Kanti Children’s Hospital at Maharajgunj, which was until recently among our most mismanaged and dirtiest public hospitals—and this was a hospital for children. The doctors, nurses and other staff there were rude, offensive even, to the parents who brought their children there for treatment. Nor did the hospital staffs seem to have a clue about how to deal with …