Might be matter for investigations: Experts
Members of the general
public and experts concerned have taken the property statements submitted by
Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal and other ministers as unconvincing and at
odds with the lifestyles of those leaders. Former bureaucrats said such
disparity between the property details of the leaders and their lifestyle
can be a matter for investigations.
Prime Minister Dahal
and all the ministers made public their property details on Wednesday. Much to
everyone's surprise, The prime minister stated that all he has by way of
property is one katha (3,645 square feet)of land in his wife Sita's name
in Chitwan and 3 tola (34.992 grams) of gold, while Deputy Prime Minister
and Minister of Finance Krishna Bahadur Mahara has also stated that he owns
very little property.
Deputy Prime Minister
Mahara has stated that he owns a two-storey Nepali style house, a cow shed and
seven ropani (one ropani is 5,476 square feet) of land in Rolpa district, and
has Rs 80,000 at Everest Bank. A day after the property details were made
public, individuals from various sectors and the public in general
criticized the leaders for not making public the real extent of their
property holdings.
Former home secretary
Shreekanta Regmi said that the lavish lifestyles of the leaders make a mockery
of the property statements that they have issued. "Their property details
are doubtful as these do not comport in any way with their lavish lifestyles.
If they are poor as they have projected themselves to be, how come they are
enjoying such a lavish lifestyle?" he said.
He said that those
leaders who have projected themselves as implausibly poor can be a subject for
investigations. The Commission for Investigation of Abuse of Authority (CIAA)
should look into the matter, he added.
Former CIAA
chief commissioner Suryanath Upadhyay echoed Regmi, saying the property details
of the prime minister and some other ministers did not reflect reality. He said
that the property details furnished by the prime minister and other ministers
are unbelievably modest, given their lavish lifestyle even before they came to
power.
"Comparing the
property details they have made public with the lifestyles they have been
enjoying since even before coming to power will make clear whether or not
they have presented a factual picture. The CIAA can look into the matter,"
he added. He said the CIAA can recommend legal action if any person
holding public office has tried to hide his/her property holdings. Similarly,
Surya Raj Acharya, a policy analyst and engineer, took to Twitter to vent his
criticism. He has tweeted that there should be investigations into the income
sources of rich ministers and also into how the ministers who are not rich had
been making a living to date.
Rabindra Adhikari, a
CPN-UML lawmaker, questioned on Twitter why the prime minister did not
mention his bank account into which he has been receiving his salary as prime
minister.
Sangeet Sangroula
16-12-2016, MyRepublica
Comments
Post a Comment